In an age of incredible technological advancement and thorough safety precautions, near death experiences are harder to come by these days. Ted-Ed speaker, Ric Elias, found himself walking out of a plane crash that should have, in all likelihood, brought his story to an end. With a new outlook on life, Elias took to the Ted-Ed stage to share his experience with the public, and offer some advice from a man who nearly lost it all. Throughout his speech, Elias emphasizes three key lessons that his near death experiences had taught him, in hopes that others can see the light in the same way he had. The speaker skillfully used various methods of development, stylistic devices, and diction in his attempt to remind the audience of the things that should matter most in a person’s life.
In order for his message to be received with the full impact that was intended, Ric Elias opened his Ted talk with a brief narration of the events which would eventually lead him to the stage. He recounts the minutes leading up to his plane crash, describing his seating arrangements and his dialogue with a flight attendant. Within his narration, Elias utilized subtle imagery techniques. In fact, the very first word that he spoke was, “Imagine”. With the help of this device, the speaker’s narration was able to engage the audience by tapping into their senses. By immersing the listeners in the scenario on which the narration is based, Elias gains their attention right from the get go. After his initial story is received, the audience is more capable of putting themselves in the shoes of the speaker, and can understand the message to follow with greater empathy. The most glaring method of development unfolds throughout the entire duration of the talk, and does a very effective job of communicating the speaker’s thesis. Ric Elias employs the cause and effect method of development as the pillar of his Ted talk. Elias first narrates his near death experience in engaging fashion, and proceeds to spend the remainder of his speech noting the changes in outlook on life that have surfaced as a result of what he had endured.

Ric Elias demonstrates a variety of stylistic devices during his speech which help to convey the general thesis. Getting to work early with the fancy literary tools once again, Elias presents an Onomatopoeia to the audience during his initial narration, describing the sound of the engine as, “Clah clah clah clah”. The verbal imitation of a sound significant to the experience of a plane crash allows listeners to gain a better understanding of what the speaker had undergone, which eventually strengthens the emotional connection, or pathos of the presentation. Pathos is also apparent in Elias’ speech towards the end, where he appears quite choked up and emotional as he begins to address his children and fatherhood.
Another key stylistic device was utilized as the speaker began his transition from the cause portion of the speech, to the effects that it would have. Elias uses an analogy to convey his new outlook on life, stating that he “collects bad wine, because if the wine is ready and the person is there, [he] is opening it”. This metaphor has a profound effect on the audience’s understanding of Elias’ thesis, as it demonstrates his revelation that we should try to put ourselves through as many experiences as possible in our short lifetimes, because they are, in fact, short, and increased exposure to opportunity leads to a more fulfilled life.
In addition to the content of his speech, Ric Elias’ Ted talk is presented through a variety of camera angles in order to convey different messages. In particular, you may notice that there are two particular sections in the speech where the camera is focussed more closely on the speaker’s face. These zoom-ins occur as Elias is describing the moment of impact in his plane crash, and again as he speaks of his children, two moments which happen to carry heavy emotional baggage. By bringing the audience closer to Elias’ face, the camera crew and production team allow viewers to tap into the emotions portrayed by the speaker during these specific moments to help them fully understand the significance of the change that Elias’ near death experience has provoked.
Finally, Ric Elias controls his speaking tone and diction with expertise to further engage audience members. Despite the situation that he is describing, Elias maintains a sense of calmness during his speech. Although it may appear inconsequential, the relaxation in his voice speaks volumes about the changes he has undergone due to the accident. Elias speaks of how he has cut out the negativity in his life, and focussed instead on happiness. This newfound tranquility is reflected in the relaxation of the speaker’ tone, as he never appears to be flustered or anxious. In terms of diction, Elias keeps it simple, using mostly informal diction as if he were talking to a friend. The use of informal diction acts as an engagement tool, allowing listeners to feel as though they are in a regular conversation rather than being given a speech amongst a large crowd.
All in all, Ric Elias certainly utilized many tools to capture the attention of the audience, and help them better understand the positive change that a near death experience gave rise to. Personally, I admire the lifestyle adjustments that the speaker emphasizes, and I believe that if we can all take a page from his book (excluding the plane crash of course), the world would be a better place.


